More Essay Examples on Rape Rubric Deniers of genocide and other large scale human rights violations generally through the application of fallacious arguments, erroneous facts and historical distortions seek to demonstrate that certain events never occurred - The rape of nanking Essay introduction.
The Rape of History: Nanking and Japanese Denial by J. A student essay from Dr. When most people think of the Holocaust, they think of the most evil capable of humanity: However, for a marginal segment of the population, the term "Holocaust" is associated with lies spread by the Jewish community.
These people are referred to as "Holocaust deniers" because they deny the three things that make the Holocaust so horrific: Holocaust deniers claim to be true historians, but their beliefs are most often motivated by an anti-Jewish agenda.
Their attempt at historical revisionism is not valid because it is not done for legitimate reasons: In similar ways, anyone with a political agenda can misrepresent facts for their own purposes.
Japan, led by Emperor Hirohito, was very militaristic and imperialistic, much like Germany. During its occupation of China and other areas of Asia, the Japanese military is reported to have committed many atrocities. One specific period of Japanese occupation that was particularly brutal was the six-week occupation of Nanking in The occupation of Nanking has become known as the "Rape of Nanking" among the Chinese.
The topic today is still a sensitive issue in Japan, and is not recognized as a massacre, or even an extreme act of violence.
In Japan, the Nanking Massacre is a lie; much like how Holocaust deniers believe the Holocaust is a lie. My purpose is to demonstrate that Japan has misrepresented the facts related to the occupation of Nanking, China, in To do this, I will critically analyze the arguments given in the recent Nanking denial publication, The Alleged "Nanking Massacre": How and why is it that the Nanking deniers have been so successful in ensuring that the Nanking Massacre is not widely known?
Why has Germany acknowledged the crimes of the Nazis, and paid wartime reparations, whereas Japan has not done the same? These are important questions to ask in investigating the denial of the Nanking Massacre.
It is the duty of historians to refute denial movements so that historical lies are not spread. In her book, The Rape of Nanking: And even the United States, faced with the threat of communism in the Soviet Union and mainland China, sought to ensure the friendship and loyalty of its former enemy, Japan.
In this manner, Cold War tensions permitted Japan to escape much of the intense critical examination that its wartime ally was forced to undergo. Chang wrote The Rape of Nanking because she believes it is time for Japan to recognize its massacre in Nanking.
Acknowledging the massacre in Nanking will help to make Japan a better country, in that: Germany is today a better place because Jews have not allowed that country to forget what it did nearly sixty years ago. The American South is a better place for its acknowledgement of the evil of slavery and the one hundred years of Jim Crowism that followed emancipation.
Japanese culture will not move forward until it too admits not only to the world but to itself how improper were its actions of just a century ago.
The deniers of the Nanking Massacre often begin by presenting Japan as having "no intention of starting the war against China,"  the Sino-Japanese War.
They even claim that the Japanese government offered a peace proposal in August of However, the war was expanded to Shanghai, as "the Japanese Army continued to suffer from the enemy suppression.
In order to protect the citizens of the city, the "International Committee of the Nanking Safety Zone," organized by John Rabe, requested that Nanking be declared a safety zone that should not be attacked.
The Japanese Army did not accept the request because the Chinese Army had ignored it by "hiding themselves inside the zone.
How many Chinese were "murdered" in the Nanking Massacre? One reason why the Japanese do not recognize the Nanking Massacre is because the number of victims is "controversial. Japan"s Rebuttal to China"s Forged Claims, two Japanese university professors, Tado Takemoto and Yasuo Ohara, use a chart to compare the extremes in the numbers of supposed victims of the "Nanking Massacre.
In addition, they claim that the high ofcould not have happened because the population of Nanking when the battle began was "no more thanNanking deniers question eyewitness testimony to the Nanking Massacre. The deniers are particularly unconvinced by the testimony of Lu Su, who claimed that on the night of December 16, the Japanese Army took 57, refugees and soldiers into custody, bound them to one another with wire, and ordered them to form four columns and walk in a straight line.
The army then shot the refugees with machine-guns.
The Rape of Nanking, or Nanjing Datusha, as it is known as in China, wiped out an entire city full of art and history. Although this was true, it is often referred to as the “forgotten Holocaust”/5(1). Essay on Rape of Nanking notes. Japanese troops wanted to get rid of Nanking entirely to break the spirit of Chinese resistance. During the time of the genocide, the United States took the articles written in magazines such as Times, Readers Digest and New York Times doubtfully. The Nanking Massacre was an episode of mass murder and mass rape committed by Japanese troops against the residents of Nanjing (Nanking), then the capital of the Republic of China, during the Second Sino-Japanese War.
Afterwards, the army poured kerosene onto the bodies and set them afire; the burnt corpses were then thrown into the Yangtze River.
Takemoto and Ohara argue that it would be nearly impossible to count the "exact number of 57, victims in the dark night. Furthermore, they argue that throughout the entire process of the "massacre" Lu Su claims to have witnessed, there should have been at least one more witness, but there is not.A student essay from Dr.
Elliot Neaman's History class (historical methods - fall ) The occupation of Nanking has become known as the "Rape of Nanking" among the Chinese. The topic today is still a sensitive issue in Japan, and is not recognized as a massacre, or even an extreme act of violence. The Rape of Nanking Essay The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II The book that I chose to read was The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II by Iris Chang.
This book describes the mass murder and large scale depravity by the Japanese army during World War II . The Rape of Nanking and Tiananmen Square Essay - Throughout history, genocide has been one of the most devastating human calamities.
The Rape of Nanking, or the Nanking Massacre is an example of one of the worst genocides in history. Rape of Nanking In December of , the Japanese Imperial Army marched into China's capital city of Nanking and began to murder , out of , civilians and soldiers in the city.
The Rape of Nanking, or Nanjing Datusha, as it is known as in China, wiped out an entire city full of art and history. Although this was true, it is often referred to as the “forgotten Holocaust”/5(1). The Rape of Nanking, or the Nanking Massacre, officially started when imperial Japanese troops marched into Nanking on December 13, With prearranged orders "to kill all captives", the Japanese soldiers entered the city and arbitrarily killed men, women, and children without any intellectual 3/5(5).